Congratulations to Rob DiTusa and Laura Mangini who obtained outstanding jury verdicts for two of our clients yesterday in Springfield District Court. It’s a credit to their hard work and preparation. In this case, a mother and daughter were victims of a rear end car crash, but the other driver never truly took responsibility for his carelessness. His insurance company, Liberty Mutual, refused to make a reasonable offer to settle the case and we were forced to go to trial. Unfortunately, “low balling” victims is typical of how Liberty Mutual handles claims. The problem with this insurance strategy is that it forces victims to go to trial to get fair compensation, and it exposes people insured by Liberty Mutual to verdicts which may exceed their insurance policies. Fortunately, through our firm’s hard work and the compassion of a Springfield jury, our clients will be fully compensated for their injuries.

The next step in this case is to once again pursue an insurance company for bad faith punitive damages, which will hopefully be a lesson to Liberty Mutual that their tactics cost them more in the long run. I’m sure Rob and Laura will bring the same level of dedication to this part of the case that they always do. I’m very proud of Rob, Laura, and our entire team, for the level of advocacy we provide for our clients. -Ryan

rear end collision attorney

Congratulations to Attorneys Rob DiTusa and Laura Mangini, who recently won an insurance bad faith case. The insurance company refused to compensate our client after her car accident. We believed the insurance company had failed to reasonably investigate the rear end collision and invented “facts” to support their position that their driver was not at fault. After prevailing against the driver in a jury trial two years ago, we pursued a second claim directly against the insurance company for bad faith insurance claims handling. The Court ruled in our client’s favor and found the insurance company had committed bad faith. The Court tripled our client’s prior jury award as damages for the insurer’s bad faith. Great Job! -Ryan


making insurance companies pay

Congratulations to Attorneys Rob DiTusa and Stephen Holstrom for their trial victory last week. Making insurance companies pay what they should is not only important for the case that was tried, but to send a message for all cases going forward. Great job guys!! – Ryan

Attorneys Rob DiTusa and Laura Mangini tried a case over the last week on behalf of a client, against an insurance company, for Bad Faith Claims Handling. Holding insurance companies responsible, when they don’t handle claims in accordance with the law, should make them think twice before engaging in such actions going forward The trial ended yesterday, but because it was a bench trial (the judge alone decides) we likely will not have a decision for many months. Watching how hard they’ve worked, especially in the weeks leading up to the trial, makes me proud of the team we’ve assembled. -Ryan

Progressive Direct Insurance Settlement

The law firms of Alekman DiTusa, LLC and Connor, Morneau and Olin, LLP are proud to announce final settlement of Estrada v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company. In 2011, our law firms jointly filed a consumer protection class action lawsuit on behalf of Massachusetts consumers against Progressive Insurance Company. On Friday, January 29, 2016, the settlement received final approval from the United Stated District Court in Boston.

The case involved Massachusetts auto insurance policies originally purchased on Progressive’s website from 2008-2010. The Court certified a class, which included 4,311 people whose claims for accident-related medical bills and lost wages denied due to an $8,000 PIP deductible on their automobile insurance policy. Progressive Direct denied any wrongdoing in the sales and marketing of their policies.

The terms of the settlement call for payment of $1,875.00 to each of the 4,311 class members who make a claim against the settlement fund (totaling a potential $8,083,125 in payments directly to class members, legal fees and costs paid separately). Attorneys’ fees and costs are paid separately and do not come out of the claimant’s money. Each of the 4,311 affected consumers should have received written notice of the settlement in December and January. Details can be found at All claims must be filed by February 28, 2016.

Class actions level the playing field between consumers and large corporate interests. We are proud of the outstanding settlement we were able to reach after 4 years of hard-fought litigation against one of the nation’s largest car insurance companies.

Ryan and Rob.

trial jury victory

Another trial for Alekman DiTusa this week. An insurance company grasped onto a nonsense reason to not pay medical bills following an accident. Rob DiTusa and Stephen Holstrom proved to the jury that the treatment should have been paid. Proud of our team again this week.

Congratulations to Attorneys DiTusa and Holstrom for their victory yesterday against an insurance company that didn’t want to pay what they owed our client.

rear end collision settlement

I am very proud of the hard work and dedication that my law partner, Rob DiTusa, and our associate, Laura Mangini, showed on trial this week. The number of hours and late nights, reviewing materials and preparing, really shows their dedication to doing right by our clients.

This was a rear-end crash, with little visible property damage. Our client, a gentleman, had a pre-existing medical problem, for which his doctor had recommended surgery. However, before the collision, our client considered his pain to be tolerable and chose not to have surgery. Unfortunately, the accident made his pain much worse and forced him to surgery much sooner than anticipated.

Through their hard work, Rob and Laura were able to prove to the jury that this crash made his pre-existing problems worse. Yesterday, the jury awarded our client $100,000 for his injuries. It was also important to our client that they found him to be credible, and made the defendant take responsibility for her actions, which will ultimately be paid for by her insurance company. The defendant’s insurer never made a reasonable offer, which required this case to go to trial.

Ryan Alekman

A 37 year-old man was severely injured in a head-on motor vehicle collision while driving home from work. Client went on to have three back surgeries, including a two level low back fusion and a permanent nerve stimulator. Client was later determined to be totally and permanently disabled from work as a result of the accident.

A 29 year-old retail sales clerk, suffered multiple fractures in his right leg and ankle in multiple vehicle collision which occurred on a three lane divided highway. The incident consisted of two separate collisions involving three vehicles. A sedan traveling in the far right lane collided with a tractor trailer which was traveling in the center lane. As a result of contact with the truck, the sedan spun across two lanes of traffic and came to rest against a guardrail in the left travel lane. Plaintiff was traveling in the left travel lane before the collision and struck the sedan traveling at 70 mph. We recovered the majority of the settlement from the owner of the tractor trailer.


STAY CONNECTED WITH US:transparent-facebook-logo-icon1-1024x1024